ZITADEL vs Hanko
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
ZITADEL compared with Hanko
| Detail | ZITADEL | Hanko |
| What it does | Identity Infrastructure, Simplified
| Modern Authentication. On Your Terms.
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | CH
| DE
|
|---|
| Pricing model | freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Hosted login page
- Social login integration
- Multifactor authentication
- Passwordless authentication with passkeys
- Role-based access control
- Multi-tenant support
- gRPC and REST APIs
- Custom workflows with ZITADEL Actions
- Service account management
- Multiple deployment options
| - Passkeys
- Multi-factor authentication
- Social SSO
- Custom domain
- Admin dashboard
- Webhooks
- Admin API
- Custom SMTP
- SAML SSO
- Profile Element for account management
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Open source and community-driven with transparent development model
- Built specifically for developers with modern APIs and comprehensive SDKs
- Multi-tenant architecture built into the core platform
- Extensible with custom workflows and code integrations
- Bridges enterprise and open source solutions
| - Framework-agnostic Web Components
- FIDO2-certified passkey infrastructure
- EU-based with flexible hosting options
- Flow API handles authentication complexity
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 69 ● no change since last check | 61 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 26 | 24 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 46 | 41 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1397 | 897 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to ZITADEL More alternatives to Hanko